On Princess Diana’s Death

On Monday 2006-02-06, the Daily Express carried the article copied below entitled ‘Diana Death: Spies flashed laser beam at crash driver’. The article makes a good plot. It is an excellent fusion of truths and half truths – it is plausible – it could have happened that way and indeed there currently stands sufficient quasi evidence and motive to prompt a conviction.

Quite simply – I believe it was an ‘accident’ (i.e. not planned nor pre-mediated by the British establishment or the Royal family). I understand there has been a cover up on certain matters such as Diana’s pregnancy but such cover is routinely applied in sensitive situations. I am informed that neither Prince Charles nor his sons were aware of Princess Diana’s condition – it seemed both privately and publicly prudent that such news was kept hidden. The reasons why I believe the crash to have occurred ‘accidentally’ are:

a)Reliable and trustworthy sources told me so
b)The British did neither operate nor had a ‘wet jobber’ team in operation at that time.
c) Her death caught intelligence’s ‘sanctum’ off guard. While discussing another royal death in ‘On Royal Nazis and the Scottish connection’ I wrote: ‘His Royal Highness The Prince George, Duke of Kent (George Edward Alexander Edmund von Wettin, later Windsor) (20 December 1902 - 25 August 1942) was the fourth son of King George V of the United Kingdom and Queen Mary. He was the father of the current Duke of Kent, Princess Alexandra, the Honourable Lady Ogilvy, and Prince Michael of Kent.’‘The Duke of Kent was killed in a plane crash on active service in World War II at Eagles Rock near Dunbeath, Caithness, Scotland. His wife had given birth to their third child, Prince Michael of Kent, only six weeks earlier. He was initially buried in St. George's Chapel, Windsor, England: his remains were later moved to the royal burial ground, adjacent to Queen Victoria's mausoleum, at Frogmore, Windsor, England. He was succeeded as Duke of Kent by his elder son, Edward.’I am criticised as to the lack of depth in this article so I now say:In the first instance I gained much of my information from my late father G. A. F. Frost . He, as is explained elsewhere upon this site during the Second World, was an elite commando. Given time I will write more on his fascinating life. The central issue of his wartime career was that he was Churchill’s assassin – namely he was employed in the covert removal of perceived troublesome characters –such being certain government ministers of the Irish Free State and a somewhat nasty Swede. According to my father he was ordered by the late King and Churchill to remove Prince George (who my father was told was the figure head of an establishment plot to murder Churchill, the King, the Queen, and the two Princesses and replace same with Prince George and a number of infamous characters out of the Red Book) The plan was then for the British Empire to join up with Hitler against the Russians; in turn Germany would make peace with the US and declare war on Japan. Such plan was well known to the Russians viz Prince George’s homosexual relations in particular with Anthony Blunt – a factor which explains why it was not until the actual defeat of Hitler in 1945 did Russia declare war on Japan. Thus I hope my statements above will somewhat mollify the lack of specification criticism that prior commentary on the deaths’ of Prince George and Princess Diana has engendered.